|Published (Last):||21 April 2014|
|PDF File Size:||16.20 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.55 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
For the historian these two things, thought and belief, or thought and action, had to remain separate. The first stage is microhistorical. Employing philological techniques, Ginzburg spent considerable time and care attempting to reconstruct Menocchio’s reading list based on textual clues contained in his testimony before the inquisitors.
Because the individuals whose lives are unearthed by the nominative methods employed by microhistorians are most often exceptional in some way, they should be treated as statistically significant even though they do grendii appear at first edoarvo to be representative.
His major concern centered around the inherent relativism of cultural anthropology. Cite this article Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography. The report looked at what Russian cities look like in terms of population density, how the patterns Russian cities exhibit compare with those of other cities around the world, and what individual behaviours might have contributed to the appearance edoardp a certain pattern.
Translated by Eren Branch. Low to High Price: Ginzburg and Poni, in their Quaderni Storici article “Il nome e grendu come” translated by Edward Muir as “The Name and the Game” argued that the fundamental unit of analysis for the microhistorian should be people’s names, since these may be traced, compared, and confirmed through a wide variety of archival sources, including tax records, birth registers, notarial contracts, and court cases.
Superficially at least, these two studies could easily be seen as belonging to two different genres entirely. Seniors in Russia are not responsive eroardo public promotion of healthy living. Grenfi, microhistory does not lend itself to effective synchronic narratives. The data dictate the analytical method to be employed, not the other way around. His argument, therefore, focuses on the ways in which culture can be described by the historian, not the mechanisms through which social change eventually occurs.
RU EN user search. The term “microhistory” was first coined by a group of Italian historians associated with the journal Quaderni Storici and, later, a series of edoatdo, microstorie, published by Einaudi.
However, while the Italian microhistorians were revolting against the broad structuralist work of the Annales school, they were in no sense antistructuralists. Agency at the edoarvo of structure. The microhistorians’ response was to define new ways of approaching documentary evidence and archival research.
The microhistorians also objected to the increasingly popular use of quantitative methods inspired by the French Annales practitioners, the Cambridge Population Group, and American cliometricians.
The microhistorian is required to spend so much time, effort, and space exploring the implications of a few painstakingly researched events that to expand the boundaries of one case edpardo would be unwieldy.
In essence, microhistory starts from a set of surprising facts and proceeds to seek out a theory that helps explain them.
Moreover, the argument goes, statistically insignificant occurrences are just that. All Formats Paperback Sort by: Although the Italian microhistorians defended themselves vigorously from such attacks, they were also quite aware of the dangers inherent in their method. The Cheese and the Worms. There are already signs that this edoarddo happening, as Italian scholars employed in American universities have begun to incorporate features of both types of analysis.
Particularly, he spoke about working on his book, Education, Love and Grief. Love and Marriage in Renaissance Florence. Geertz was convinced that universal rules, whatever their apparent utility as explanatory tools, were flawed, because every system of social exchange is unique.
There is also no shared opinion about the extent to which microhistory is a relevant and productive area today. Are you an author?
The microhistorians also remain convinced that empirical methods distort history by edardo variety and difference. The Baptism, the Arezzo Cycle, the Flagellation.
Polanyi: dall’antropologia economica alla microanalisi storica by Edoardo Grendi | LibraryThing
Ginzburg, Carlo, and Carlo Poni. However, digital infrastructures are not the same globally. Another microhistorical principle involves a standard of historical proof that Carlo Ginzburg termed the “evidential paradigm,” sometimes referred to in English as the “conjectural paradigm. Levi argued that while such microhistorical studies may be interesting as interpretive exercises, they are of limited use as historical examples because they are ultimately imponderable and meaningless.
Adapting an anthropological approach to the study of history presented the microhistorians with a number of challenges. Italian archives are by far the richest in Europe in terms of the size and chronological scope of their holdings, and also in terms of the variety of documents they contain, especially the court cases that have provided greendi most common starting point for microhistorical studies.
A microhistorian should stop at this stage. Historians are generally faced with the problem of edoareo phenomena in two, somewhat incompatible, dimensions.